Effectiveness of face masks for reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review.

This rapid systematic review of evidence asks whether (i) wearing a face mask, (ii) one type of mask over another and (iii) mandatory mask policies can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection, either in community-based or healthcare settings. A search of studies published 1 January 2020-27 January 2023 yielded 5185 unique records. Due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies were included in the analysis. We analysed 35 studies in community settings (three RCTs and 32 observational) and 40 in healthcare settings (one RCT and 39 observational). Ninety-five per cent of studies included were conducted before highly transmissible Omicron variants emerged. Ninety-one per cent of observational studies were at 'critical' risk of bias (ROB) in at least one domain, often failing to separate the effects of masks from concurrent interventions. More studies found that masks (n = 39/47; 83%) and mask mandates (n = 16/18; 89%) reduced infection than found no effect (n = 8/65; 12%) or favoured controls (n = 1/65; 2%). Seven observational studies found that respirators were more protective than surgical masks, while five found no statistically significant difference between the two mask types. Despite the ROB, and allowing for uncertain and variable efficacy, we conclude that wearing masks, wearing higher quality masks (respirators), and mask mandates generally reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission in these study populations. This article is part of the theme issue 'The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the COVID-19 pandemic: the evidence'.

Effectiveness of physical rehabilitation in improving physical functioning and quality of life for long-term-care residents with dementia: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation versus non-rehabilitation control in improving physical functioning and quality of life in long-term care residents with dementia. INTRODUCTION: Many long-term-care residents live with dementia and have impaired physical function and poor quality of life. Physical rehabilitation can improve physical function and quality of life for people living with dementia, yet many long-term-care residents with dementia do not receive this intervention, and health care providers are unsure of which rehabilitation interventions are effective. Studies synthesizing effective rehabilitation programs are needed to guide practice in the long-term-care sector where many residents live with dementia. Previous studies have focused broadly on long-term care, specific professions, interventions or outcomes, or people with dementia in the community. Our review will focus on long-term-care residents living with dementia and a broader definition of physical rehabilitation. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include studies that evaluate physical rehabilitation in comparison with non-rehabilitation controls among long-term-care residents with any severity of dementia. We will include studies that measure the effect on performance-based physical functioning and self- or proxy-reported quality of life. METHODS: Searches will be conducted in APA PsycINFO (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane CENTRAL database with no date or language limitations. Two independent reviewers will conduct a critical appraisal of eligible studies, assess methodological quality, and extract the data. Where possible, studies will be pooled in a statistical meta-analysis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022308444.

A paradigm change to inform fibromyalgia research priorities by engaging patients and health care professionals.

Background: Research objectives should be focused toward advancing knowledge that has meaningful impact on health. However, research agendas are mostly driven by the health care community, with limited input from patients. Aims: In this study, prioirities of uncertainties for the management of fibromyalgia (FM) that could propel future research were identified by a defined process using the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA-PSP) methodology. Methods: As a first step, a survey was distributed across Canada that engaged patients, caregivers, and health care professionals to provide narrative input to eight open-ended questions regarding FM care. Responses were thematically condensed and synthesized into an initial list of 43 uncertainties used to guide a comprehensive literature search. Questions already effectively addressed in the literature were excluded, leaving 25 uncertainties that were ranked during a one-day consensus workshop. Results: Three broad themes emerged: the value of personalized targeted treatment and subgrouping of patients; the efficacy of various self-management strategies and educational initiatives; and identification of the ideal health care setting to provide FM care. Opioids and cannabinoids were the only specific pharmacologic interventions ranked as needing further research. Conclusions: The prioritized questions highlight the importance of recognizing the heterogeneity of FM symptoms, the need for a personalized treatment approach, and a better understanding of the value of self-management strategies. This is the first study that uses an established and transparent methodology to engage all FM stakeholders to help inform researchers and funding bodies of clinically relevant research priorities.

Contexte: Les objectifs en matière de recherche devraient se concentrer sur l'avancement des connaissances qui ont des effets significatifs sur la santé. Toutefois, les programmes de recherche sont surtout définis par le milieu des soins de santé, tandis que la contribution des patients demeure limitée.Objectifs: Dans cette étude, les incertitudes prioritaires pour la prise en charge de la fibromylagie, qui pourraient donner lieu à de futures études, ont été déterminées selon un processus fondé sur la méthodologie du Partenariat d'établissement des priorités de la James Lind Alliance.Méthodes: Comme première étape, une enquête a été distribuée partout au Canada auprès de patients, de prestataires de soins et de professionnels de la santé afin d'obtenir leurs réponses sous forme narrative à huit questions ouvertes concernant les soins relatifs à la fibromyalgie. Les réponses ont été regroupées par thèmes et résumées dans une liste initiale de 43 incertitudes qui a été utilisée pour orienter une recherche exhaustive de la littérature. Les questions déjà abordées de manière efficace dans la littérature ont été exclues, tandis que les 25 incertitudes restantes ont été classées dans le cadre d'un atelier de recherche de consensus d'une journée.Résultats: Trois grands thèmes se sont démarqués : l'utilité des traitements ciblés personnalisés et de la division des patients en sous-groupes; l'efficacité de diverses stratégies d'auto-prises en charge et initiatives éducatives; et la détermination du cadre de soins de santé idéal pour dispenser les soins relatifs à la fibromyalgie.Conclusions: Les questions priorisées soulignent l'importance de reconnaître l'hétérogénéité des symptômes de la fibromyalgie, la nécessité d'une approche de traitement personnalisé et une meilleure compréhension de l'utilité des stratégies d'auto-prise en charge. Il s'agit de la première étude à utiliser une méthodologie établie et transparente pour impliquer toutes les parties concernées par la fibromyalgie pour aider à faire connaître aux chercheurs et aux agences de financement les priorités pertinentes sur le plan clinique.